Australopithecus is a genus of hominin that includes the ancestors of all modern humans and which emerged in Africa during the Late Pliocene, some 4.2 million years. The first example consisted of fossilized parts of the skull of a small primate and were discovered by workmen in a lime quarry at Taung, South Africa in 1924. These were then examined by Raymond Dart, an Australian anatomist working at the University of Witwatersrand who was able to ascertain by the structure of the base of the skull that he was dealing with a bipedal primate with a brain about the size of a chimp. He named it Australopithecus africanus, “the Southern Ape from Africa”.
Up until then it was generally assumed the human beings had evolved in Asia where the fossils of Homo erectus were first discovered, so finding an earlier representative of the hominin line in Africa was quite a shock to the scientific community. They had also taken it for granted that the traits defining what it is to be ‘humanity’— large brains, an upright posture and the manufacture of tools—came as a package. Now they were confronted by a hominin that walked on its hind legs yet had a relatively tiny brain.
Since then, several kindred species have been found in different parts of the continent (although none outside Africa). It has become clear since the discovery of ‘Lucy’ (A. afarensis) who dates to about 3.5 million BP, that the genus originated in East Africa where its precursors have been found.
Early on it was recognized that there were at least two australopithecine lineages, one described as ‘gracile’ and the other ‘robust’. Many scholars assign the latter to a separate genus (Paranthropus) but there is no consensus so far. It is clear from modern dating methods, that the robust lineage is later and contemporary with the earliest human species such as Homo habilis. In the final years of the 20th century, two more genera, Ardipithecus and Orrorin, both of which are earlier than Australopithecus, have been identified and have both been classified as Australopithecina. No doubt many further discoveries await.
Perhaps the thorniest problem when it comes to constructing a taxonomy for any early hominins is the scattered nature of the evidence. The overwhelming majority of the fossils come from very specific geographical regions of Africa—the Rift Valley of East Africa and the limestone caves of the South African Highveld. Conditions for preservation are much better there than in the rest of the continent—much of which is covered by jungle or vast tracts of desert sand—and the political situation has been generally more stable. For these reasons, establishing direct links between species in different regions is almost impossible. Even in regions where the fossils survive and are reasonably accessible, the remains are rarely found in situ and undisturbed. The activities of predators and scavengers and the forces of erosion ensured they were most often broken and well-scattered. Consequently, it is very difficult to decide whether or not a particular bit of bone belongs to the same species as another. Needless to say, this is the subject of warm discussions in the academic community.
Dating
Initially only relative dating was possible for these finds and that was based on the remains of extinct animals belonging to known geological periods that had been found in association with them. However, since the 1940s a number of radiometric dating methods have been employed. They are based on the known rate of decay of various radioactive isotopes. These break down by what are known as ‘half-lives’, which means that, after a given number of years, half of the isotope will have disappeared. The clock starts ticking when the material (organic or inorganic) stops absorbing new isotopes.
The first of these methods to appear was Radiocarbon dating which was developed in the 1940s. All living organisms are made up of carbon and they all absorb radioactive Carbon 14 from the atmosphere and continue to absorb it until they die. Unfortunately, its half-life is only some 5,700 years and it cannot be used to date material more than 60,000 years old.
A number of other fairly common elements found in the rocky matrix in which the fossils are found can also be used. Many, such as the Potassium-Argon and Uranium-Thorium methods, which also rely on known rates of isotopic decay, only apply to volcanic deposits, such as those in the rift valleys of East Africa. They of no use when it comes to the sedimentary rocks of the dolomite caves of South Africa. The same applies to fission track dating, which is based on the spontaneous fission of Uranium 238 when rocks have been heated— through volcanic activity, for example. The most successful method used in the caves has been uranium-lead dating (U-Pb). It compares the different rates at which two uranium isotopes, 238U and 235U, turn into lead. These techniques are often used in combination with analysis of periodic changes in the polarity of the earth’s magnetic field (palaeomagnetism). When rocks form, the minerals in it align themselves with the current direction of the magnetic poles. Records of the geomagnetic reversals can be matched to specific time periods.
Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) Thermoluminescent (TL) dating measure the emission of trapped electrons in crystalline minerals. In the case of the latter, the material is heated and the electrons will escape, producing light which can be measured to estimate the date when the material was formed or last heated. ESR measures the effect of the trapped electrons on the magnetic properties of the material. It is particularly useful for dating speleothems, such as stalactites, stalagmites and flowstones, and fossilized teeth.
The latest technique, isochron burial dating, uses radioisotopes to determine when the minerals that made up the breccia surrounding a fossil were last exposed to cosmic rays. The isotopes so created decay at known rates once they are buried and the ratios between them to calculate when that occurred.
Suggested Reading
Ayala, F. J. and C. J. Cela-Conde | (2017) | Processes in Human Evolution. Second Edition |
Barham, L. & P. Mitchell | (2008) | The First Africans. African Archaeology from the Earliest Toolmakers to Most Recent Foragers |
Cartmill, M. & F.H. Smith | (2022) | The Human Lineage. Second Edition |
Dart, Raymond | (1925) | Australopithecus africanus: The Man-Ape of South Africa. Nature |
Johanson, D. & Maitland Eddy | (1981) | Lucy. The Beginnings of Humankind |
Owen-Smith, N. | (2021) | Only in Africa |
Scarre, C. (edit.) | (2018) | The Human Past. Fourth Edition |